Should You Build eLearning Internally or Partner Externally?
Alexander (Zander) Scott
COO | eResponders
When organizations start planning to move their training online, one question tends to come up early and stay unresolved longer than it should.
Should we build this ourselves or bring in an external partner?
It sounds like a straightforward capacity question. But in my experience leading operations across diverse teams and contexts, what looks like a resource decision is almost always a strategy decision.
I’ve seen this play out in community development work, in nonprofit programs, and in eLearning projects. When teams try to do everything internally without the right infrastructure, the result is rarely faster or cheaper. It’s usually just harder, and the quality reflects that.
What building eLearning internally actually requires
Building eLearning internally means more than having someone who knows the content. It requires instructional design expertise, access to professional authoring tools, project management bandwidth, and sustained time across a multi-month development process.
For most mission-based organizations, those resources are already fully committed to the work they exist to do. Asking program staff to also become eLearning developers is a significant ask, and it often pulls focus away from the communities they serve.
What partnering externally actually means
Partnering externally is not a shortcut. When done well, it is a deliberate decision that protects your funding, your timeline, and the integrity of your training. A good partner doesn’t replace your expertise. They give it professional shape and scale it further than your internal team could alone.
This is something I think about a lot in the context of sustainable development. The most effective partnerships are the ones where each side brings what they do best, and neither side tries to do it all.
A simple framework to help you decide
Before committing to either path, ask yourself honestly:
Build internally if:
-
- Your team has a dedicated instructional designer on staff
- You have the bandwidth to manage a multi-month development process
- Your team has access to authoring tools and LMS expertise
- Your training content is stable and rarely changes
Partner externally if:
-
- Your team has content expertise but not eLearning development experience
- You are working with grant funding and a defined timeline
- You need a professional product that reflects your brand
- Your staff capacity is already stretched across programs
- Protecting your mission voice through the process matters deeply
The key question underneath all of it is this: is building this ourselves the best use of our organization’s time and resources right now?
That one question, answered honestly, usually makes the path forward clear.
Want to see the full process?
If you’re working through this decision and want a clearer picture of what the eLearning development process actually looks like, we put together a free planning guide for training leaders at mission-based organizations. It covers the key questions to answer before you start and walks you through each phase of a professional eLearning project.